Proxy Disclosure About Executive Security

I spent the heart of the pandemic teaching myself how to make videos and made several dozen about what is – and what isn’t – considered a perquisite for proxy reporting purposes. As noted in this video, the question of “for purposes of the proxy statement filed with the SEC, is personal security a perk?” has a mixed answer. A lot of companies rightfully believe it has a legitimate business purpose. The SEC believes otherwise. The SEC thinks it’s a perk.

After last week’s tragic event, many companies likely will be re-evaluating whether they need executive security – and some may decide they believe it has a legitimate business purpose.

Here’s the disclosure that Lockheed Martin has about security for its CEO and other officers from its 2024 proxy:

And here’s the disclosure that Meta Platforms has about security for its CEO and other officers from its 2024 proxy:

Related Posts

Disclosure About New Types of C-Suite Officers (Such as CCOs, CSOs and CISOs)

Chevron’s Director Skills & Qualifications: “What the Board Is Looking For”

Section

Recent Posts

A Hot Tip for More Junior Disclosure Drafters
We Have 90 “Transparency Advocates”
How Companies Are Disclosing Executive Security Arrangements
Wow! What Does AI Think of Transparent Disclosure?
The Beauty of Intertwined Disclosure
“The Risks of Not Shooting Straight”