Proxy Disclosure About Executive Security

I spent the heart of the pandemic teaching myself how to make videos and made several dozen about what is – and what isn’t – considered a perquisite for proxy reporting purposes. As noted in this video, the question of “for purposes of the proxy statement filed with the SEC, is personal security a perk?” has a mixed answer. A lot of companies rightfully believe it has a legitimate business purpose. The SEC believes otherwise. The SEC thinks it’s a perk.

After last week’s tragic event, many companies likely will be re-evaluating whether they need executive security – and some may decide they believe it has a legitimate business purpose.

Here’s the disclosure that Lockheed Martin has about security for its CEO and other officers from its 2024 proxy:

And here’s the disclosure that Meta Platforms has about security for its CEO and other officers from its 2024 proxy:

Related Posts

Disclosure About New Types of C-Suite Officers (Such as CCOs, CSOs and CISOs)

Chevron’s Director Skills & Qualifications: “What the Board Is Looking For”

Section

Recent Posts

The Need for Alignment When Drafting Disclosure
Eight Disclosure Practice Pointers
Disclosure About New Types of C-Suite Officers (Such as CCOs, CSOs and CISOs)
Transparency in Financial Reporting
Transparency for the New Year: Less is More
Transparency About Pay Opportunities for Executives